Controversially, this direct partnership led to the closure of the UN Office on Sport for Development and Peace ( Burnett, 2017). According to the IOC, this direct partnership “will help sport to fulfill its role as “an important enabler of sustainable development”, as outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals” ( IOC, 2017). In 2017, the UN and the IOC agreed on a direct partnership. In 2009, the IOC became a Permanent Observer of the UN, an honor usually reserved for non-member states, but very rarely granted to non-governmental organizations ( Van Luijk, 2018). Since then, the organizations have gotten closer. In 1952, UNECO's executive board authorized the organization to be represented at the Olympic Games in Helsinki ( Meier, 2017). After the foundation of the UN in 1945, discussions progressed mainly through the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The beginning of the relationship between the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the United Nations (UN) can be dated back in the 1920s, when there were some discussions between Pierre de Coubertin and the League of the Nations (“La Société des Nations”), a forerunner of the UN ( Grosset and Attali, 2008). The selected studies show a contradiction between the discourse of sport mega-events guardians for supporting the United Nations Sustainable Goals (SDG) and the practice of human rights within host cities of such events. Findings showed that residents suffered either direct, forced evictions or indirect displacements. The gigantism and the sense of urgency created by the Olympic Games may explain why this event has been frequently associated with resident displacement. In empirical studies, displacement of residents has been studied exclusively in the context of the Olympic Games, since Seoul 1988, but with a higher frequency in most recent Games (Beijing, London, and Rio). From the initial 2,372 works reviewed, 22 met the inclusion criteria. We also excluded works that associate sport mega-events with urban transformations but are not related to resident displacement. We excluded conceptual papers, conference abstracts, and works that discuss urban transformation or displacement but are not related to sport events. Following the PRISMA protocol, we conducted a search of academic and gray literature in sport, social sciences, and humanities databases. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to understand how empirical data have informed the knowledge about the relationship between hosting sport mega-events and displacement of host community residents. Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, Sport Management Programme, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.Unhandled exception 0xC0000005 at 0x126AFC(MEGAsync. Unhandled exception 0xC0000005 at 0x126AFC(MEGAsync.exe) Then I started MEGAsynch again immediately after, this time it didn't crash and it was able, even if with a very slow file scanning, to retrieve back the changes I applied at work to the synced files. Today for somewhat reason my home PC powered itself down, so when I came back home I had to turn it on, started MEGAsync, it detected the files/folders I modified at work, and after some seconds crashed. You seem to be saying the crash did NOT occur on the second restart? In both of my PCs I'm sharing the whole account through a single folder and its subdirectories. I have to start it a second time to avoid this.Īnd is the sync into your own account or a shared folder? When I come back home (PC B), I login back to access Windows 7, MEGAsync wakes up from idle and detect all of those changes, but after 10 seconds it crashes. When at work (PC A), I added/removed/modified files and folders, for a total of no more than 200/300 items. Could you please let us know what sort of changes you have made to the account before the crash occurs - deleting or moving files or folders, perhaps between syncs? Or just adding files/folders?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |